The “open border welcome all without accessing the system” has resulted in tens of thousands pouring into the united States without anyone knowing anything about the types of individuals entering. One cannot hardly access any news that doesn’t include a report about an illegal alien invader committing some type of crime. Granted, not all illegal alien invaders commit additional crimes outside of violating the immigration law. But, these individuals are still criminals because of the law violation.
With the election of Donald Trump to the presidency and the policy of returning to enforcing the immigration law, bleeding heart liberals, leftists and illegal alien invaders have jumped to the forefront to thrash anyone and everyone who speaks about enforcing the immigration law, which can lead to deportation as a result. Moreover, under Obama, several cities and States have declared its boundaries to be a “sanctuary” for illegal alien invaders. Adding insult to injury, Obama, through his constitutional pardon ability that he abused, released thousands of dangerous criminal illegal alien invaders from prison that included individuals convicted of rape, murder, assault, etc.
Now, in the sanctuary city of Baltimore and its satellite Rockville, MD, a 14 year-old girl was raped by illegal alien invaders aged 17 and 18 that ended up being in the same high school and classroom as the victim. But, instead of the blame being placed where it should be, with the perpetrators, everything and everyone else is being blamed, including the victim.
The attorneys for the 18 year old perpetrator, Henry E. Sanchez Milan, say the encounter was “consensual.” Moreover, the attorneys claim the perpetrators are being used as a “scapegoat by the opponents of recent immigration practices.” According to the victim’s report, this encounter was anything but “consensual” — it was criminal rape.
Parents were outraged over the crime, expressing their feelings fiercely toward the school and school superintendent. In response, the school superintendent for Montgomery County Public Schools, Dr. Jack Smith, dubbed the parents’ outrage as “racially motivated.” In an email, Dr. Smith stated the responses from parents have been “racist” and “xenophobic.”
“While I know this tragic incident has become part of a national political debate, I want to remind community members that the lives of real students have been forever affected,” Smith said in an email Thursday published by Townhall.com.
“While many have chosen to engage civilly in the conversation, far too many have crossed the line with racist, xenophobic calls and emails,” Smith wrote. “MCPS is working with law enforcement to identify those who are making threats toward our students and schools. This behavior will not be tolerated in our community.”
According to Townhall.com, the email failed to mention the suspects were in the republic illegally and one facing deportation.
Interesting that Dr. Smith placed the focus not on the crime that occurred at the high school but on the response of the parents to a violent, brutal crime committed inside the high school where parents expect a modicum of safety for their children. Smith failed to acknowledge that an 18 year old male was placed in the same classroom as 13 and 14 year old students. And, to add insult to injury, Smith is quick to point out his focus is “working with law enforcement to identify those who are making threats toward our students and schools.”
Being a racist or a xenophobe is not a crime. While Smith claimed there were threats made, his entire focus was on racism and xenophobia. Why did Smith not indicate what type of threats were being made? Any type of threat toward students or the schools that would involve violence and/or injury should be relayed to the parents with appropriate measures taken to insure student and faculty safety. One has to question Smith’s statement since his focus is “racist, xenophobic calls, and emails.”
While Dr. Smith, Rockville, and Baltimore, MD, may be operating under the illegal “sanctuary city” mode, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan “slammed immigration enforcement and Montgomery County Public Schools in an interview with WTTG-TV.”
Why is an 18-year-old man in a class with 13- or 14-year-old girls?” Hogan asked. “Why was his status not known to those folks? Why was he allowed to enter the country after he was picked up for illegally crossing the border — both of them?
This first question is one that MCPS superintendent, along with the Rockville High School principal, has to answer for the governor as well as the parents of students attending MCPS schools. Immigration enforcement is over the pickle barrel since one of the two suspects, Milan, was “apprehended by Border Patrol agents in Texas last August as he illegally entered the United States from Mexico.”
“The only reason the older youth, Sanchez Milian, was in the country at all was because of the Obama administration’s catch and release policies that allowed him to be resettled in Maryland (with the support of taxpayers), with few questions asked,” the Center for Immigration Studies’ Director of Policy Jessica Vaughan told Breitbart News.
“Few groups of illegal immigrants have left such a violent mark in our community as these so-called unaccompanied minors—they are almost like modern day Marielitos (the Cuban inmates released by Fidel Castro decades ago),” she said. “Dozens have been arrested for violent crimes in Maryland, New York, Massachusetts, Virginia and Texas.”
According to Vaughan, “Eighty percent of the tens of thousands of Central American kids who were caught by the Border Patrol and released by [the Department of Health and Human Services] have been released to other illegal aliens.”
How convenient. But, the issue here is not immigration. The immigration law is clear despite what these attorneys, the school system superintendent, bleeding heart liberals and leftist, and proponents of illegal “sanctuary cities/states” want, believe or think. The issue is not consent since the age of consent in Maryland is 16 years old. Granted, there is the exception under the “Romeo and Juliet law” that indicates consent can take place between two underage individuals that are close in age, usually four years. But, on several occasions the victim said “no” or “stop.” That dismisses the consent due to being close in age. And, this was the case of two illegal alien invader males engaging in forced sexual encounters with a 14 year old girl.
Despite what the Supreme Court ruled in Pyler v. Doe, forbiding “public schools from withholding taxpayer funding from illegal aliens, allowing them to enroll in schools meant to educate citizens’ children”, taxpayers should not have their funds being spend on individuals who need to be deported. The Constitution does not apply to foreigners or non-citizens. And, the Supreme Court does not make law; they issue rulings that apply only to the litigants involved as with any other court.
Moreover, if states and localities choose to use taxpayer funds to educate illegal alien invaders, these illegal alien invaders who are above the average age of attendance of school children should not be placed in the same classroom as students that are younger. Granted, these illegal alien invaders may have had the educational level of an eighth or ninth grader, but they should not have been placed in the same classroom. In this case, separate remedial classes would have been more appropriate.
The issue here is two violent illegal alien invaders attacking a 14 year old girl in an environment where a modicum of safety is expected. Rape is not about sex — it is about power and control. It is a violent crime against women, girls, men and boys.
The two perpetrators should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law and deported back to their country of origin. And, the family of the victim should push to have the State of Maryland, who is attempting to pass legislation to be a “sanctuary state” in violation of immigration law, the MCPS school superintendent, the city of Rockville, and the principal of Rockville High School named as accomplices in the crime since they contributed to its facilitation and sued civilly. Individuals in State and local governments hid behind “sanctuary city/State” status to avoid civil torts when illegal alien invaders commit crimes in their district, all the while knowing that providing “sanctuary” knowingly to illegal alien invaders is a violation of immigration law.
Until the victims and victims’ families push back legally against these declared “sanctuary cities/States”, hitting them in the pocketbook, this practice will continue and more criminals will be allowed to run free in our communities. Likewise, the federal government should fiercely enforce the immigration law to include prosecution of city officials who declare their locality a sanctuary for illegal alien invaders.
Ask yourself this question; If a city/state is a sanctuary for illegal alien invaders from immigration law and other crimes, why are they not “sanctuaries” for citizen criminals? If you can’t think of a good answer, then ask, “who are the real racists?”