Corrupt Department of Justice Refuses to Protect Electoral College Voters by Ignoring Threats Made to Electors

As the Hussein Soetoro administration comes to a close, it will be remembered as the most lawless, corrupt and criminal presidency in US history among the fact bearers and truth seekers.  Time and again, Hussein Soetoro appointed corrupt, criminal and lawless individuals to head key departments and agencies.  And, the Senate, being complicit in their support of Soetoro, confirmed each one.  Moreover, citizens of the republic have seen laws ignored, bypassed with a “memo,” and changed via dictatorial edict — all the while a silent Congress sat in session without taking one action to curb the lawless Soetoro.

In a previous article, it was mentioned that members of the Electoral College in several States have received threatening emails with some issuing death threats.  At the very least, this qualifies as “voter intimidation” and “issuing terroristic threats and actions.”  Yet, the corrupt Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch refused to investigate these threats and protect voters as required by Section 11b of the Voters’ Rights Act (52 U.S.C. §10307).

The Daily Caller attempted to investigate why the DOJ refused to investigate the harassment, intimidation and death threats received by electoral college members across multiple states where Trump won the popular vote.  In an email on Wednesday, November 30, 2016, Deputy Press Secretary for the Department of Justice, David Jacobs, wrote, “The Department will decline to comment.”

At a Department that was concerned about protecting voters at the polls, this same department now has “no comment” about not protecting electoral college voters, covered under the same Voters’ Rights Act.  Section 14 (c) of the Voters’ Rights Acts declares that voting includes “all action necessary to make a vote effective in any primary, special, or general election.”  Since the electoral college is a constitutional federal voting process to elect the president;  and, therefore, electors are covered as protected voters under Section 11 (b).

According to The Daily Caller:

The Justice Department seemed concerned about protecting voters from being intimidated at the polls on Election Day. It deployed 500 monitors to 67 jurisdictions in 28 states to watch polling stations this past presidential election cycle.

The department’s goal is “to see to it that every eligible voter can participate in our elections to the full extent that federal law provides,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a statement at the time to the Chicago Tribune. “The department is deeply committed to the fair and unbiased application of our voting rights laws and we will work tirelessly to ensure that every eligible person that wants to do so is able to cast a ballot.” 

Some have wondered, then, why the Justice Department and the FBI will not investigate the recent claims of threats and harassment of these electors as per violation of Section 11b of the Voting Rights Act (52 U.S.C. §10307).

Attorney J. Christian Adams, who previously worked in the DOJ’s civil rights division, appeared unsurprised by the department’s reaction, telling TheDC in a statement Thursday, “The Justice Department should be investigating the brutal attacks on Trump voters caught on video and the death threats to Trump electors. Federal law protects people who want to vote. The Obama Justice Department unfortunately only protects people who vote the right way.”

What could be the reason the DOJ and the FBI refuses to investigate the claims of threats received by members of the electoral college?  Why are individuals who are participating in vandalism, assault, looting, and disrupting traffic, activities the lamestream enemedia calls “protests,” being given impunity for breaking the law?  And, why are the FBI and the DOJ remaining silent when a sitting president, in essence, urged illegal alien invaders to violate voting law, claiming citizenship would be automatic upon voting?

The answer is very simple and straightforward.  The DOJ, under Loretta Lynch, and the FBI, under James Comey, are corrupt, criminal and lawless themselves.  These are the departments who, with a vengeance, targeted the peaceful protesters at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge in Oregon in order to paint American patriots as violent and lawbreaking.  Their zeal resulted in an unarmed man being killed and nine being imprisoned for exercising their First Amendment recognized and guaranteed inherent rights.  These same departments allowed violent riots to occur in Ferguson, Baltimore, and in cities around the republic based on false narratives involving police shootings in the line of duty.  Now, these same departments are not protecting electors as they should under the Voting Rights Act nor are they investigating any attacks against Trump supporters.

While some in the DOJ’s office and the FBI may very well disagree with the stance of the director and AG, the inaction on the part of both departments prove their propensity to support criminal and lawless behavior, even when the law is clear.  It proves the assessment made in the DC article — the DOJ under Hussein Soetoro only protects those who “vote the right way.”  And, the best response the DOJ can issue is “no comment?”

At this point in time, nearing the end of the Hussein Soetoro dictatorship, these departments intend to continue their corrupt, criminal and lawless actions, stepping up their game a bit,  while the people suffer through violent riots by lawless alt-lefters.  The “draining of the swamp” needs to also include some employees of the FBI and the DOJ.  First to go will be the department heads.





About Suzanne Hamner

Former professional Registered Nurse turned writer; equal opportunity criticizer; politically incorrect conservative;
This entry was posted in General, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.